Review




Structured Review

Eli Lilly migg1 isotype control ab
( A ) Ang2 protein concentration in the serum and SC lysates at different time points after EAE induction (0 dpi: n = 4; 7 dpi: n = 4; 14 dpi: n = 5; 21 dpi: n = 4; 28 dpi: n = 3). ( B ) Clinical scores and percentage of body weight loss of control (Ctrl, n = 9) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 11) mice induced with active EAE. ( C ) Clinical scores and percentages of body weight loss of mice induced with active EAE and treated with <t>mIgG1</t> versus Ang2 Ab prophylactically (starting at the time of EAE induction; 0 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( D ) Clinical scores of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab preemptively (starting during the effector phase of EAE at 7 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantifications of MBP staining to show loss of myelin in the SC white matter from both prophylactic 14 dpi and preemptive 28 dpi groups ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 100 μm. ( G ) Clinical scores of mice induced with adoptive transfer EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab starting at the time of adoptive transfer. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments ( n = 16 per group). Arrows indicate Ab injections. Mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A ), nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test ( B - D , and G , comparison of AUC values of clinical EAE scores over the disease course), 2-way repeated measures ANOVA ( B and C , body weight loss), and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( E and F ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Migg1 Isotype Control Ab, supplied by Eli Lilly, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/migg1+isotype+control+ab/migg1+isotype+control+ab/pmc07108925-148-0-4
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
migg1 isotype control ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS"

Article Title: Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

doi: 10.1172/JCI130308

( A ) Ang2 protein concentration in the serum and SC lysates at different time points after EAE induction (0 dpi: n = 4; 7 dpi: n = 4; 14 dpi: n = 5; 21 dpi: n = 4; 28 dpi: n = 3). ( B ) Clinical scores and percentage of body weight loss of control (Ctrl, n = 9) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 11) mice induced with active EAE. ( C ) Clinical scores and percentages of body weight loss of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab prophylactically (starting at the time of EAE induction; 0 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( D ) Clinical scores of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab preemptively (starting during the effector phase of EAE at 7 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantifications of MBP staining to show loss of myelin in the SC white matter from both prophylactic 14 dpi and preemptive 28 dpi groups ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 100 μm. ( G ) Clinical scores of mice induced with adoptive transfer EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab starting at the time of adoptive transfer. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments ( n = 16 per group). Arrows indicate Ab injections. Mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A ), nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test ( B - D , and G , comparison of AUC values of clinical EAE scores over the disease course), 2-way repeated measures ANOVA ( B and C , body weight loss), and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( E and F ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Ang2 protein concentration in the serum and SC lysates at different time points after EAE induction (0 dpi: n = 4; 7 dpi: n = 4; 14 dpi: n = 5; 21 dpi: n = 4; 28 dpi: n = 3). ( B ) Clinical scores and percentage of body weight loss of control (Ctrl, n = 9) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 11) mice induced with active EAE. ( C ) Clinical scores and percentages of body weight loss of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab prophylactically (starting at the time of EAE induction; 0 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( D ) Clinical scores of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab preemptively (starting during the effector phase of EAE at 7 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantifications of MBP staining to show loss of myelin in the SC white matter from both prophylactic 14 dpi and preemptive 28 dpi groups ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 100 μm. ( G ) Clinical scores of mice induced with adoptive transfer EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab starting at the time of adoptive transfer. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments ( n = 16 per group). Arrows indicate Ab injections. Mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A ), nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test ( B - D , and G , comparison of AUC values of clinical EAE scores over the disease course), 2-way repeated measures ANOVA ( B and C , body weight loss), and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( E and F ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Techniques Used: Protein Concentration, Control, Staining, Adoptive Transfer Assay, MANN-WHITNEY, Comparison

( A ) Flow cytometric quantification of the number of immune cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 12 dpi ( n = 10 per group). ( B ) RT-qPCR quantification of mRNA levels of Th signature cytokines ( Ifng , Tnf , Il4 , and Il17a ) and integrin subunits ( Itga4 and Itgb1 ) in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group). ( C ) Flow cytometric quantification of the number of immune cells in the SCs of control ( n = 6) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 9) EAE mice at 12 dpi. ( D and E ) Representative immunofluorescent images and quantifications of Iba1 + microglia and macrophages, Ly-6G + granulocytes, and CD4 + Th cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated control and EAE mice ( n = 10 per group) at 14 dpi as well as in the SCs of control ( n = 7) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) control and EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test ( A - E ), and 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons (Iba1 staining in D and E ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Flow cytometric quantification of the number of immune cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 12 dpi ( n = 10 per group). ( B ) RT-qPCR quantification of mRNA levels of Th signature cytokines ( Ifng , Tnf , Il4 , and Il17a ) and integrin subunits ( Itga4 and Itgb1 ) in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group). ( C ) Flow cytometric quantification of the number of immune cells in the SCs of control ( n = 6) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 9) EAE mice at 12 dpi. ( D and E ) Representative immunofluorescent images and quantifications of Iba1 + microglia and macrophages, Ly-6G + granulocytes, and CD4 + Th cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated control and EAE mice ( n = 10 per group) at 14 dpi as well as in the SCs of control ( n = 7) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) control and EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test ( A - E ), and 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons (Iba1 staining in D and E ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Staining

( A ) T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) analysis of main immune cell clusters in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab– treated EAE mice at 14 dpi and single transgenic control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi. Heatmap showing log 2 expression of known marker genes for each cluster. ( B and C ) Relevant GO biological processes of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated genes after Ang2 blockade and upregulated genes after Ang2 overexpression in microglia ( B ) and macrophages ( C ). ( D and E ) Venn diagram illustrating the number of genes that were regulated by Ang2 in microglia and macrophages. ( F ) Violin plots showing mRNA expression of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated APOE-induced and MHCII-associated genes after Ang2 blockade. IgG, mIgG1; A2, Ang2 Ab. ( G ) Representative images and quantifications of MHCII immunostaining in Iba1 + cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group) and control ( n = 7) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. ( H ) Representative flow cytometry overlay plots and quantifications showing GMFI of MHCII expression in microglia and macrophages in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group) and control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi ( n = 8 per group). Mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test ( G and H ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) analysis of main immune cell clusters in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab– treated EAE mice at 14 dpi and single transgenic control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi. Heatmap showing log 2 expression of known marker genes for each cluster. ( B and C ) Relevant GO biological processes of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated genes after Ang2 blockade and upregulated genes after Ang2 overexpression in microglia ( B ) and macrophages ( C ). ( D and E ) Venn diagram illustrating the number of genes that were regulated by Ang2 in microglia and macrophages. ( F ) Violin plots showing mRNA expression of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated APOE-induced and MHCII-associated genes after Ang2 blockade. IgG, mIgG1; A2, Ang2 Ab. ( G ) Representative images and quantifications of MHCII immunostaining in Iba1 + cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group) and control ( n = 7) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. ( H ) Representative flow cytometry overlay plots and quantifications showing GMFI of MHCII expression in microglia and macrophages in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group) and control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi ( n = 8 per group). Mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test ( G and H ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Techniques Used: Transgenic Assay, Control, Expressing, Marker, Over Expression, Immunostaining, Flow Cytometry

( A ) Violin plots showing expression of Angpt2 and its receptors Tek , Itga5 , and Itgb1 in EC, microglia, and macrophage clusters of mIgG1- and Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice. ( B ) GMFI of Tie2 and α 5 integrin on the surface of ECs, macrophages, and microglia from naive versus EAE mice (naive, n = 4; EAE, n = 3) at 14 dpi as analyzed by flow cytometry. ( C ) Flow cytometric analysis of active cell surface integrin (FN7-10 binding) relative to total cell surface α 5 β 1 integrin in microglia and macrophages from mIgG1- and Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice (mIgG1, n = 8; Ang2 Ab, n = 7) at the disease peak (16 dpi). Mean ± SEM, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( B ) and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( C ). * P < 0.05; *** P < 0.001.
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Violin plots showing expression of Angpt2 and its receptors Tek , Itga5 , and Itgb1 in EC, microglia, and macrophage clusters of mIgG1- and Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice. ( B ) GMFI of Tie2 and α 5 integrin on the surface of ECs, macrophages, and microglia from naive versus EAE mice (naive, n = 4; EAE, n = 3) at 14 dpi as analyzed by flow cytometry. ( C ) Flow cytometric analysis of active cell surface integrin (FN7-10 binding) relative to total cell surface α 5 β 1 integrin in microglia and macrophages from mIgG1- and Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice (mIgG1, n = 8; Ang2 Ab, n = 7) at the disease peak (16 dpi). Mean ± SEM, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( B ) and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( C ). * P < 0.05; *** P < 0.001.

Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Binding Assay

( A and B ) t-SNE analysis of the main EC clusters (venous and arterial) in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi and single transgenic control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi. capillary-V, capillary-venous; capillary-A, capillary-arterial. ( C ) Heatmap showing log 2 expression of known marker genes in each cluster. ( D and E ) Relevant GO biological processes of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated genes after Ang2 blockade ( D ) and upregulated genes after Ang2 overexpression ( E ) in the SC capillary-venous ECs. ( F ) Venn diagram illustrating the number of genes that were regulated by Ang2 in the SC capillary-venous ECs. ( G ) Violin plots showing Vcam1 expression in different EC clusters as well as its differential expression in capillary-venous ECs regulated by Ang2. ( H and I ) Representative images (EAE) and quantification of VCAM1 in the SC blood vessels of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated control ( n = 6 per group) and EAE ( n = 10 per group) mice at 14 dpi and control versus EC-Ang2 control (Ctrl, n = 3; EC-Ang2 , n = 4) and EAE (Ctrl, n = 7; EC-Ang2 , n = 8) mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( H and I ). *** P < 0.001.
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A and B ) t-SNE analysis of the main EC clusters (venous and arterial) in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi and single transgenic control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi. capillary-V, capillary-venous; capillary-A, capillary-arterial. ( C ) Heatmap showing log 2 expression of known marker genes in each cluster. ( D and E ) Relevant GO biological processes of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated genes after Ang2 blockade ( D ) and upregulated genes after Ang2 overexpression ( E ) in the SC capillary-venous ECs. ( F ) Venn diagram illustrating the number of genes that were regulated by Ang2 in the SC capillary-venous ECs. ( G ) Violin plots showing Vcam1 expression in different EC clusters as well as its differential expression in capillary-venous ECs regulated by Ang2. ( H and I ) Representative images (EAE) and quantification of VCAM1 in the SC blood vessels of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated control ( n = 6 per group) and EAE ( n = 10 per group) mice at 14 dpi and control versus EC-Ang2 control (Ctrl, n = 3; EC-Ang2 , n = 4) and EAE (Ctrl, n = 7; EC-Ang2 , n = 8) mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( H and I ). *** P < 0.001.

Techniques Used: Transgenic Assay, Control, Expressing, Marker, Over Expression, Quantitative Proteomics

( A and B ) Representative images and quantifications of Evans blue leakage in the SCs of naive ( n = 3), mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice ( n = 5 per group) and control versus EC-Ang2 control ( n = 6 per group) and EAE ( n = 7 per group) mice at 12 dpi. ( C ) Representative images and quantification of extravascular TER-119 + RBCs in the SCs of control ( n = 6) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 1- or 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A and B ) and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( C ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A and B ) Representative images and quantifications of Evans blue leakage in the SCs of naive ( n = 3), mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice ( n = 5 per group) and control versus EC-Ang2 control ( n = 6 per group) and EAE ( n = 7 per group) mice at 12 dpi. ( C ) Representative images and quantification of extravascular TER-119 + RBCs in the SCs of control ( n = 6) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 1- or 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A and B ) and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( C ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Techniques Used: Control

Related Articles

Control:

Article Title: Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS
Article Snippet: .. Ab administration. mIgG1 isotype control Ab (Eli Lilly and Co.), mouse anti-mouse Ang2 Ab (18E5, Eli Lilly and Co.), hIgG1 isotype control Ab (Synagis, AbbVie), and ABTAA (16) were administrated i.p. at a dose of 20–25 mg/kg body weight 2 to 3 times a week. ..

Article Title: Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS
Article Snippet: .. mIgG1 isotype control Ab (Eli Lilly and Co.), mouse anti-mouse Ang2 Ab (18E5, Eli Lilly and Co.), hIgG1 isotype control Ab (Synagis, AbbVie), and ABTAA ( ) were administrated i.p. at a dose of 20–25 mg/kg body weight 2 to 3 times a week. ..



Similar Products

90
GenScript corporation isotype control abs (migg1 d265a and higg4 s228p) antibody
Isotype Control Abs (Migg1 D265a And Higg4 S228p) Antibody, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/migg1+isotype+control+ab/anti+htigit++migg1+backbone++clone+10a7/pmc11148541-116-8-19
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
isotype control abs (migg1 d265a and higg4 s228p) antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Eli Lilly migg1 isotype control ab
( A ) Ang2 protein concentration in the serum and SC lysates at different time points after EAE induction (0 dpi: n = 4; 7 dpi: n = 4; 14 dpi: n = 5; 21 dpi: n = 4; 28 dpi: n = 3). ( B ) Clinical scores and percentage of body weight loss of control (Ctrl, n = 9) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 11) mice induced with active EAE. ( C ) Clinical scores and percentages of body weight loss of mice induced with active EAE and treated with <t>mIgG1</t> versus Ang2 Ab prophylactically (starting at the time of EAE induction; 0 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( D ) Clinical scores of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab preemptively (starting during the effector phase of EAE at 7 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantifications of MBP staining to show loss of myelin in the SC white matter from both prophylactic 14 dpi and preemptive 28 dpi groups ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 100 μm. ( G ) Clinical scores of mice induced with adoptive transfer EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab starting at the time of adoptive transfer. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments ( n = 16 per group). Arrows indicate Ab injections. Mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A ), nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test ( B - D , and G , comparison of AUC values of clinical EAE scores over the disease course), 2-way repeated measures ANOVA ( B and C , body weight loss), and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( E and F ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Migg1 Isotype Control Ab, supplied by Eli Lilly, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/migg1+isotype+control+ab/migg1+isotype+control+ab/pmc07108925-148-0-4
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
migg1 isotype control ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Amgen isotype-control migg1 ab clone 4d2 antibody
( A ) Ang2 protein concentration in the serum and SC lysates at different time points after EAE induction (0 dpi: n = 4; 7 dpi: n = 4; 14 dpi: n = 5; 21 dpi: n = 4; 28 dpi: n = 3). ( B ) Clinical scores and percentage of body weight loss of control (Ctrl, n = 9) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 11) mice induced with active EAE. ( C ) Clinical scores and percentages of body weight loss of mice induced with active EAE and treated with <t>mIgG1</t> versus Ang2 Ab prophylactically (starting at the time of EAE induction; 0 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( D ) Clinical scores of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab preemptively (starting during the effector phase of EAE at 7 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantifications of MBP staining to show loss of myelin in the SC white matter from both prophylactic 14 dpi and preemptive 28 dpi groups ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 100 μm. ( G ) Clinical scores of mice induced with adoptive transfer EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab starting at the time of adoptive transfer. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments ( n = 16 per group). Arrows indicate Ab injections. Mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A ), nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test ( B - D , and G , comparison of AUC values of clinical EAE scores over the disease course), 2-way repeated measures ANOVA ( B and C , body weight loss), and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( E and F ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Isotype Control Migg1 Ab Clone 4d2 Antibody, supplied by Amgen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/migg1+isotype+control+ab/isotype+control+migg1+ab+clone+4d2+antibody/pm23836059-58-5-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
isotype-control migg1 ab clone 4d2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson migg1 isotype control ab (mopc-21) antibody
( A ) Ang2 protein concentration in the serum and SC lysates at different time points after EAE induction (0 dpi: n = 4; 7 dpi: n = 4; 14 dpi: n = 5; 21 dpi: n = 4; 28 dpi: n = 3). ( B ) Clinical scores and percentage of body weight loss of control (Ctrl, n = 9) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 11) mice induced with active EAE. ( C ) Clinical scores and percentages of body weight loss of mice induced with active EAE and treated with <t>mIgG1</t> versus Ang2 Ab prophylactically (starting at the time of EAE induction; 0 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( D ) Clinical scores of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab preemptively (starting during the effector phase of EAE at 7 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantifications of MBP staining to show loss of myelin in the SC white matter from both prophylactic 14 dpi and preemptive 28 dpi groups ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 100 μm. ( G ) Clinical scores of mice induced with adoptive transfer EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab starting at the time of adoptive transfer. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments ( n = 16 per group). Arrows indicate Ab injections. Mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A ), nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test ( B - D , and G , comparison of AUC values of clinical EAE scores over the disease course), 2-way repeated measures ANOVA ( B and C , body weight loss), and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( E and F ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Migg1 Isotype Control Ab (Mopc 21) Antibody, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/migg1+isotype+control+ab/isotype+controls/pm20580567-78-26-34
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
migg1 isotype control ab (mopc-21) antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson pe-conjugated migg1 isotype control ab
( A ) Ang2 protein concentration in the serum and SC lysates at different time points after EAE induction (0 dpi: n = 4; 7 dpi: n = 4; 14 dpi: n = 5; 21 dpi: n = 4; 28 dpi: n = 3). ( B ) Clinical scores and percentage of body weight loss of control (Ctrl, n = 9) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 11) mice induced with active EAE. ( C ) Clinical scores and percentages of body weight loss of mice induced with active EAE and treated with <t>mIgG1</t> versus Ang2 Ab prophylactically (starting at the time of EAE induction; 0 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( D ) Clinical scores of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab preemptively (starting during the effector phase of EAE at 7 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantifications of MBP staining to show loss of myelin in the SC white matter from both prophylactic 14 dpi and preemptive 28 dpi groups ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 100 μm. ( G ) Clinical scores of mice induced with adoptive transfer EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab starting at the time of adoptive transfer. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments ( n = 16 per group). Arrows indicate Ab injections. Mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A ), nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test ( B - D , and G , comparison of AUC values of clinical EAE scores over the disease course), 2-way repeated measures ANOVA ( B and C , body weight loss), and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( E and F ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Pe Conjugated Migg1 Isotype Control Ab, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/migg1+isotype+control+ab/isotype+controls/pm10359205-83-19-24
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe-conjugated migg1 isotype control ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Ang2 protein concentration in the serum and SC lysates at different time points after EAE induction (0 dpi: n = 4; 7 dpi: n = 4; 14 dpi: n = 5; 21 dpi: n = 4; 28 dpi: n = 3). ( B ) Clinical scores and percentage of body weight loss of control (Ctrl, n = 9) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 11) mice induced with active EAE. ( C ) Clinical scores and percentages of body weight loss of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab prophylactically (starting at the time of EAE induction; 0 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( D ) Clinical scores of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab preemptively (starting during the effector phase of EAE at 7 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantifications of MBP staining to show loss of myelin in the SC white matter from both prophylactic 14 dpi and preemptive 28 dpi groups ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 100 μm. ( G ) Clinical scores of mice induced with adoptive transfer EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab starting at the time of adoptive transfer. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments ( n = 16 per group). Arrows indicate Ab injections. Mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A ), nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test ( B - D , and G , comparison of AUC values of clinical EAE scores over the disease course), 2-way repeated measures ANOVA ( B and C , body weight loss), and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( E and F ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS

doi: 10.1172/JCI130308

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Ang2 protein concentration in the serum and SC lysates at different time points after EAE induction (0 dpi: n = 4; 7 dpi: n = 4; 14 dpi: n = 5; 21 dpi: n = 4; 28 dpi: n = 3). ( B ) Clinical scores and percentage of body weight loss of control (Ctrl, n = 9) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 11) mice induced with active EAE. ( C ) Clinical scores and percentages of body weight loss of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab prophylactically (starting at the time of EAE induction; 0 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( D ) Clinical scores of mice induced with active EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab preemptively (starting during the effector phase of EAE at 7 dpi) ( n = 10 per group). ( E and F ) Representative images and quantifications of MBP staining to show loss of myelin in the SC white matter from both prophylactic 14 dpi and preemptive 28 dpi groups ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 100 μm. ( G ) Clinical scores of mice induced with adoptive transfer EAE and treated with mIgG1 versus Ang2 Ab starting at the time of adoptive transfer. Data are pooled from 2 independent experiments ( n = 16 per group). Arrows indicate Ab injections. Mean ± SEM, 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A ), nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test ( B - D , and G , comparison of AUC values of clinical EAE scores over the disease course), 2-way repeated measures ANOVA ( B and C , body weight loss), and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( E and F ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: mIgG1 isotype control Ab (Eli Lilly and Co.), mouse anti-mouse Ang2 Ab (18E5, Eli Lilly and Co.), hIgG1 isotype control Ab (Synagis, AbbVie), and ABTAA ( ) were administrated i.p. at a dose of 20–25 mg/kg body weight 2 to 3 times a week.

Techniques: Protein Concentration, Control, Staining, Adoptive Transfer Assay, MANN-WHITNEY, Comparison

( A ) Flow cytometric quantification of the number of immune cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 12 dpi ( n = 10 per group). ( B ) RT-qPCR quantification of mRNA levels of Th signature cytokines ( Ifng , Tnf , Il4 , and Il17a ) and integrin subunits ( Itga4 and Itgb1 ) in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group). ( C ) Flow cytometric quantification of the number of immune cells in the SCs of control ( n = 6) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 9) EAE mice at 12 dpi. ( D and E ) Representative immunofluorescent images and quantifications of Iba1 + microglia and macrophages, Ly-6G + granulocytes, and CD4 + Th cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated control and EAE mice ( n = 10 per group) at 14 dpi as well as in the SCs of control ( n = 7) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) control and EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test ( A - E ), and 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons (Iba1 staining in D and E ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS

doi: 10.1172/JCI130308

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Flow cytometric quantification of the number of immune cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 12 dpi ( n = 10 per group). ( B ) RT-qPCR quantification of mRNA levels of Th signature cytokines ( Ifng , Tnf , Il4 , and Il17a ) and integrin subunits ( Itga4 and Itgb1 ) in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group). ( C ) Flow cytometric quantification of the number of immune cells in the SCs of control ( n = 6) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 9) EAE mice at 12 dpi. ( D and E ) Representative immunofluorescent images and quantifications of Iba1 + microglia and macrophages, Ly-6G + granulocytes, and CD4 + Th cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated control and EAE mice ( n = 10 per group) at 14 dpi as well as in the SCs of control ( n = 7) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) control and EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test ( A - E ), and 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons (Iba1 staining in D and E ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: mIgG1 isotype control Ab (Eli Lilly and Co.), mouse anti-mouse Ang2 Ab (18E5, Eli Lilly and Co.), hIgG1 isotype control Ab (Synagis, AbbVie), and ABTAA ( ) were administrated i.p. at a dose of 20–25 mg/kg body weight 2 to 3 times a week.

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Staining

( A ) T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) analysis of main immune cell clusters in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab– treated EAE mice at 14 dpi and single transgenic control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi. Heatmap showing log 2 expression of known marker genes for each cluster. ( B and C ) Relevant GO biological processes of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated genes after Ang2 blockade and upregulated genes after Ang2 overexpression in microglia ( B ) and macrophages ( C ). ( D and E ) Venn diagram illustrating the number of genes that were regulated by Ang2 in microglia and macrophages. ( F ) Violin plots showing mRNA expression of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated APOE-induced and MHCII-associated genes after Ang2 blockade. IgG, mIgG1; A2, Ang2 Ab. ( G ) Representative images and quantifications of MHCII immunostaining in Iba1 + cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group) and control ( n = 7) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. ( H ) Representative flow cytometry overlay plots and quantifications showing GMFI of MHCII expression in microglia and macrophages in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group) and control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi ( n = 8 per group). Mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test ( G and H ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS

doi: 10.1172/JCI130308

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) analysis of main immune cell clusters in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab– treated EAE mice at 14 dpi and single transgenic control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi. Heatmap showing log 2 expression of known marker genes for each cluster. ( B and C ) Relevant GO biological processes of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated genes after Ang2 blockade and upregulated genes after Ang2 overexpression in microglia ( B ) and macrophages ( C ). ( D and E ) Venn diagram illustrating the number of genes that were regulated by Ang2 in microglia and macrophages. ( F ) Violin plots showing mRNA expression of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated APOE-induced and MHCII-associated genes after Ang2 blockade. IgG, mIgG1; A2, Ang2 Ab. ( G ) Representative images and quantifications of MHCII immunostaining in Iba1 + cells in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group) and control ( n = 7) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. ( H ) Representative flow cytometry overlay plots and quantifications showing GMFI of MHCII expression in microglia and macrophages in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi ( n = 10 per group) and control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi ( n = 8 per group). Mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test ( G and H ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: mIgG1 isotype control Ab (Eli Lilly and Co.), mouse anti-mouse Ang2 Ab (18E5, Eli Lilly and Co.), hIgG1 isotype control Ab (Synagis, AbbVie), and ABTAA ( ) were administrated i.p. at a dose of 20–25 mg/kg body weight 2 to 3 times a week.

Techniques: Transgenic Assay, Control, Expressing, Marker, Over Expression, Immunostaining, Flow Cytometry

( A ) Violin plots showing expression of Angpt2 and its receptors Tek , Itga5 , and Itgb1 in EC, microglia, and macrophage clusters of mIgG1- and Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice. ( B ) GMFI of Tie2 and α 5 integrin on the surface of ECs, macrophages, and microglia from naive versus EAE mice (naive, n = 4; EAE, n = 3) at 14 dpi as analyzed by flow cytometry. ( C ) Flow cytometric analysis of active cell surface integrin (FN7-10 binding) relative to total cell surface α 5 β 1 integrin in microglia and macrophages from mIgG1- and Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice (mIgG1, n = 8; Ang2 Ab, n = 7) at the disease peak (16 dpi). Mean ± SEM, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( B ) and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( C ). * P < 0.05; *** P < 0.001.

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS

doi: 10.1172/JCI130308

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Violin plots showing expression of Angpt2 and its receptors Tek , Itga5 , and Itgb1 in EC, microglia, and macrophage clusters of mIgG1- and Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice. ( B ) GMFI of Tie2 and α 5 integrin on the surface of ECs, macrophages, and microglia from naive versus EAE mice (naive, n = 4; EAE, n = 3) at 14 dpi as analyzed by flow cytometry. ( C ) Flow cytometric analysis of active cell surface integrin (FN7-10 binding) relative to total cell surface α 5 β 1 integrin in microglia and macrophages from mIgG1- and Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice (mIgG1, n = 8; Ang2 Ab, n = 7) at the disease peak (16 dpi). Mean ± SEM, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( B ) and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( C ). * P < 0.05; *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: mIgG1 isotype control Ab (Eli Lilly and Co.), mouse anti-mouse Ang2 Ab (18E5, Eli Lilly and Co.), hIgG1 isotype control Ab (Synagis, AbbVie), and ABTAA ( ) were administrated i.p. at a dose of 20–25 mg/kg body weight 2 to 3 times a week.

Techniques: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Binding Assay

( A and B ) t-SNE analysis of the main EC clusters (venous and arterial) in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi and single transgenic control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi. capillary-V, capillary-venous; capillary-A, capillary-arterial. ( C ) Heatmap showing log 2 expression of known marker genes in each cluster. ( D and E ) Relevant GO biological processes of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated genes after Ang2 blockade ( D ) and upregulated genes after Ang2 overexpression ( E ) in the SC capillary-venous ECs. ( F ) Venn diagram illustrating the number of genes that were regulated by Ang2 in the SC capillary-venous ECs. ( G ) Violin plots showing Vcam1 expression in different EC clusters as well as its differential expression in capillary-venous ECs regulated by Ang2. ( H and I ) Representative images (EAE) and quantification of VCAM1 in the SC blood vessels of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated control ( n = 6 per group) and EAE ( n = 10 per group) mice at 14 dpi and control versus EC-Ang2 control (Ctrl, n = 3; EC-Ang2 , n = 4) and EAE (Ctrl, n = 7; EC-Ang2 , n = 8) mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( H and I ). *** P < 0.001.

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS

doi: 10.1172/JCI130308

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A and B ) t-SNE analysis of the main EC clusters (venous and arterial) in the SCs of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice at 14 dpi and single transgenic control versus EC-Ang2 EAE mice at 12 dpi. capillary-V, capillary-venous; capillary-A, capillary-arterial. ( C ) Heatmap showing log 2 expression of known marker genes in each cluster. ( D and E ) Relevant GO biological processes of significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) downregulated genes after Ang2 blockade ( D ) and upregulated genes after Ang2 overexpression ( E ) in the SC capillary-venous ECs. ( F ) Venn diagram illustrating the number of genes that were regulated by Ang2 in the SC capillary-venous ECs. ( G ) Violin plots showing Vcam1 expression in different EC clusters as well as its differential expression in capillary-venous ECs regulated by Ang2. ( H and I ) Representative images (EAE) and quantification of VCAM1 in the SC blood vessels of mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated control ( n = 6 per group) and EAE ( n = 10 per group) mice at 14 dpi and control versus EC-Ang2 control (Ctrl, n = 3; EC-Ang2 , n = 4) and EAE (Ctrl, n = 7; EC-Ang2 , n = 8) mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( H and I ). *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: mIgG1 isotype control Ab (Eli Lilly and Co.), mouse anti-mouse Ang2 Ab (18E5, Eli Lilly and Co.), hIgG1 isotype control Ab (Synagis, AbbVie), and ABTAA ( ) were administrated i.p. at a dose of 20–25 mg/kg body weight 2 to 3 times a week.

Techniques: Transgenic Assay, Control, Expressing, Marker, Over Expression, Quantitative Proteomics

( A and B ) Representative images and quantifications of Evans blue leakage in the SCs of naive ( n = 3), mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice ( n = 5 per group) and control versus EC-Ang2 control ( n = 6 per group) and EAE ( n = 7 per group) mice at 12 dpi. ( C ) Representative images and quantification of extravascular TER-119 + RBCs in the SCs of control ( n = 6) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 1- or 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A and B ) and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( C ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: Angiopoietin-2 blockade ameliorates autoimmune neuroinflammation by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment into the CNS

doi: 10.1172/JCI130308

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A and B ) Representative images and quantifications of Evans blue leakage in the SCs of naive ( n = 3), mIgG1- versus Ang2 Ab–treated EAE mice ( n = 5 per group) and control versus EC-Ang2 control ( n = 6 per group) and EAE ( n = 7 per group) mice at 12 dpi. ( C ) Representative images and quantification of extravascular TER-119 + RBCs in the SCs of control ( n = 6) versus EC-Ang2 ( n = 8) EAE mice at 12 dpi. Scale bars: 100 μm. Mean ± SEM, 1- or 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons ( A and B ) and 2-tailed Student’s t test ( C ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: mIgG1 isotype control Ab (Eli Lilly and Co.), mouse anti-mouse Ang2 Ab (18E5, Eli Lilly and Co.), hIgG1 isotype control Ab (Synagis, AbbVie), and ABTAA ( ) were administrated i.p. at a dose of 20–25 mg/kg body weight 2 to 3 times a week.

Techniques: Control